Discourse(s) of Female Genitalia

Mutilation vs. Cosmetic Surgery

Authors

  • Jordan Wellsch

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32396/usurj.v5i2.448

Keywords:

agency, female genital cosmetic surgery, female genital mutilation, genital utility, liberal sexuality

Abstract

There is a discrepancy between “Western” engagement with female genital mutilation (FGM) and female genital cosmetic surgery (FGCS). Despite a similar ambiguity regarding the outcomes of each, FGM is ultimately condemned, while FGCS is permitted. By unpacking the dominant "Western" discourse(s) of each, this paper accounts for the discrepancy; FGCS is constructed as a medically legitimated option for enhancing the utility of one's genitals and for liberating one's sexuality, while FGM is constructed as a threat to "Western" conceptions of genital utility, sexuality and agency. Such discourse(s) arguably illustrate the tendency to condemn the contextual "other" and take “our” contextual constructions largely for granted.

Downloads

Published

2019-08-21

Issue

Section

Articles